Goldman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
In his motion for rehearing appellant requests us to again consider his bill of exception number one complaining of the argument of one of State’s counsel, and insists that the construction placed upon said bill in our original opinion is not in consonance with the record, when considered in its entirety. After a further consideration of the question we have reached the conclusion that appellant’s position is correct. It must be borne in mind that the evidence shows that R. J. (Whitey) Rutledge had been to various places in the State and out of it in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- McClure v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Spears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Lightfoot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.