Wozniak v. Segal

Plaintiff appeals from “the judgment order finding defendants hot guilty’” and from the denial of the post-trial motions and prays for a reversal of those orders.

Plaintiff contends that prejudicial arguments by defendants’ counsel and trial errors resulted in an unfair trial. She does not question the sufficiency of the evidence nor does she urge that the special jury finding of contributory negligence was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Plaintiff was injured when she was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Steelman and owned by defendant Segal. She testified that as she…