Legal Opinion

Staten v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1996No. 2-94-405-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellant Johnny Dwayne Staten was convicted by a jury of delivery of marijuana in an amount greater than four ounces but less than five pounds. In seven points of error, Staten contends the trial court erred in: (1) abandoning its neutral role and advising him not to call witnesses; (2) overruling his challenge to prospective juror number 14; (3) denying him consultation with his own expert witness; (4 & 5) allowing improper jury argument; (6) failing to properly admonish him about his waiver of counsel; and (7) denying him a speedy trial. We affirm.

In his first point…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Esteban Gutierrez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Esteban Gutierrez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  3. Garner, Naim Id-Deen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Glenn L. Jayroe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Javier Carrillo Payan v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API