Staten v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLMAN, Justice.
Appellant Johnny Dwayne Staten was convicted by a jury of delivery of marijuana in an amount greater than four ounces but less than five pounds. In seven points of error, Staten contends the trial court erred in: (1) abandoning its neutral role and advising him not to call witnesses; (2) overruling his challenge to prospective juror number 14; (3) denying him consultation with his own expert witness; (4 & 5) allowing improper jury argument; (6) failing to properly admonish him about his waiver of counsel; and (7) denying him a speedy trial. We affirm.
In his first point…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Esteban Gutierrez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Esteban Gutierrez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Garner, Naim Id-Deen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Glenn L. Jayroe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Javier Carrillo Payan v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.