Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Crystal Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1900No. 3498PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Lincoln County. — Hon. Charles H. Neal, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

The motion of respondent J. L. Kelly to dismiss the appeal of the Crystal Mining Company because of failure to send up the record in time cannot now be entertained, under the rule announced in Gustin v. Jose, 10 Wash. 217 (38 Pac. 1008), as the record was filed before the motion. This action, as originally brought, was by W. H. McNamara, as plaintiff, against the Crystal Mining Company (a corporation), G. E. Adams, J. S. Noble, D. C. Joslyn, O. B. Helson, J. K. Worts, W. M. Ridpath, and J. Fielding, as defendants. The complaint alleges, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Porter v. GarrissinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Gustin v. JoseWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rosecrans v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Churchill v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Squires v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API