Legal Opinion

Brintec Corp. v. Akzo, N. V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered December 15, 1986, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendants are enjoined from entering into the proposed joint venture with Kollmorgen Corporation prior to November 30, 1988, on condition that plaintiff posts a $250,000 bond, within 10 days of service upon it of a copy of this court’s order with notice of entry.

Plaintiff is an electronics manufacturer particularly engaged in the design,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. KesslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Four Times Square Associates, L.L.C. v. Cigna Investments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Hay Group, Inc. v. NadelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc. v. PennisiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  4. Twitchell Tech. Prods., LLC v. Mechoshade Sys., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API