Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rose

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 26, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

This is an accounting proceeding in which objections to the account of the executrix have been interposed by the decedent’s brother David Rose.

On the trial of the issues herein before the court, decision was reserved on the admissibility of certain testimony. Before disposing of the claims of the objectant, the court rules on the evidentiary matters as follows:

1. The objection by the attorney for the executrix relating to the testimony of the witness, Walter R. Samuels, on the subject of the alleged oral partnership is sustained and the answers to questions on that subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mercantile Factors Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. In re the Accounting of FinchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  3. Mercantile Factors Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API