Legal Opinion

Estate of Balfe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding commenced by the executrix of the estate of Gertrude Balfe pursuant to SCPA 1809, respondent contends that it was error for the Surrogate to disallow and dismiss his claim against the estate for $25,000 in legal fees. We disagree. Respondent is an attorney who claims that he rendered services to the decedent and to her estate for which he has not been paid. On February 15, 1989 respondent presented a claim against the estate for his fee pursuant to SCPA 1803. That claim was accompanied by respondent’s conclusory affidavit…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. EkiniciNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re GoodsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API