Legal Opinion

Rossman v. Seaver

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1898Published

Actions to set aside judgments and executions obtained against a corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The proof makes the presumption clear that Charles E. Ensign, the president of the insolvent corporation, Kirtland, Andrews & Co., favored the preference of the indebtedness against the company held by his cousin, Herman L. Ensign, to the amount of $6,200, and interest. This president took some action towards the transfer of securities, but abandoned the effort on account of its probable invalidity. He caused the note of $5,000 to be split up into smaller ones so that they and the $1,200 note might be sued in the City Court of Hew York, being thus brought within its jurisdiction. He kept…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Varnum v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. French v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Olney v. BairdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Ridgway v. SymonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API