State v. Kurle

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Eugene Kurle appealed from a judgment of conviction of the Sheridan County Court for menacing. Kurle argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s finding of guilt. 1 We reverse.

When a defendant alleges on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction, “ ‘we do not weigh conflicting evidence, nor do we judge the credibility of witnesses; instead, we look only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom to see if there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.’ ” State v. Mertz, 362…