Legal Opinion

Muller v. Schram

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 8, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill brought by the receiver of a bankrupt corporation against its officers and their wives to impress a resulting trust on certain lands in Paterson, New Jersey, the title to which stands in the names of the wives. It is admitted that $2,500 was withdrawn from the corporate funds for the purpose of making this purchase.

Speaking generally, this transaction creates a resulting trust.

In the case of Shaler v. Trowbridge (Court of Errors andAppeals), 28 N.J. Eq. 595, the court said:

"The equitable doctrine applicable to the case is well settled. If a person having a fiduciary character…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaler v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1877
  2. Stratton v. DialogueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  2. Merrill v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Von Hessert v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API