Michell v. Payne
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eelton, J..
“To render alleged newly discovered evidence available as cause for a new trial, it should appear that the evidence itself is newly discovered, not merely that certain named witnesses by whom the facts can be proved were unknown until after the trial.” Burgess v. State, 93 Ga. 304 (20 S. E. 331); Jinks v. State, 117 Ga. 714 (44 S. E. 814); Hubbard v. State, 57 Ga. App. 856 (197 S. E. 64); Watson v. State, 63 Ga. App. 252 (10 S. E. 2d, 717); Edge v. State, 200 Ga. 258 (36 S. E. 2d, 673); Wright v. State, 49 Ga. App. 342 (175 S. E. 487). It therefore follows, on the foregoing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Jinks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.