Legal Opinion

Bensalem v. Royal-Pak System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in light of plaintiff’s testimony which included a partial description of the van with New Jersey license plates which hit his bicycle; the testimony of a witness who indicated that while plaintiff was still lying in the street he pointed to the van, on the side of which the witness noticed a "Royal-Pak” insignia; and the facts that defendant only owned one van at the time of the incident and had a client near the site of the accident (see, Brotman v Biegeleisen, 192 AD2d 410, lv denied 82 NY2d 654).

As to the awards for past and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kupitz v. ElliottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Brotman v. BiegeleisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vanini v. Ramtol Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Michaels v. United States Tennis Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API