Bensalem v. Royal-Pak System, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
There was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in light of plaintiff’s testimony which included a partial description of the van with New Jersey license plates which hit his bicycle; the testimony of a witness who indicated that while plaintiff was still lying in the street he pointed to the van, on the side of which the witness noticed a "Royal-Pak” insignia; and the facts that defendant only owned one van at the time of the incident and had a client near the site of the accident (see, Brotman v Biegeleisen, 192 AD2d 410, lv denied 82 NY2d 654).
As to the awards for past and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kupitz v. ElliottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Brotman v. BiegeleisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vanini v. Ramtol Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Michaels v. United States Tennis Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001