Legal Opinion

Kissell v. County of Erie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim. Following an in camera inspection of the claimant’s expert’s report, the court determined that there was "no issue of law or fact sufficient to support the proposed claim”. Broad discretion is vested in the courts pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to grant extensions of time within which to file a notice of claim (Matter of Ziecker v Town of Orchard Park, 70 AD2d 422, 426, affd 51 NY2d 957). Various factors are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ziecker v. Town of Orchard ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Wemett v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Claim of Ziecker v. Town of Orchard ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Passalacqua v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Fish v. New York Mills Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re Foreclosure of Tax LiensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API