Bartleson-Burton v. Macys Corporate Office

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 CHAUNA BARTLESON-BURTON, Case No. 2:22-cv-02056-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8] v. 9] MACY’S CORPORATE OFFICE, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested authority pursuant to 12]

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1. Pending before the Court is 13] Plaintiff's complaint, Docket No. 1-1, which must be screened pursuant to § 1915(e). 14 An employment plaintiff must administratively exhaust her remedies before filing suit. 15] See, e.g., You v. Longs Drugs Stores Cal., LLC,

937…