Legal Opinion

Gagnon v. Speback

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1955No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ms. Justice Arnold,

Defendants appeal from the discharge of a rule to show cause why judgment should not be opened. The judgment was entered on November 2, 1953, by confession upon a note executed on October 31, 1952, by defendant Kuznesld in the name of the partnership. Kuznesld and Spevack comprised the partnership.

The note was given in payment of one-half of the purchase price for potatoes bought from plaintiff and sold and disposed of by the defendant-partnership. At the same time, plaintiff delivered to Kuzneski a bill of sale which provided in part: “. . . this sale is made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Sterle v. Galiardi Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Deviney v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Nat. Bk. of Fayette Co. v. ValentichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Montgomery v. Van RonkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alliance Discount Corp. v. ShawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Gagnon v. SpebackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Ehnes v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Kardos v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Borelli v. BarthelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API