Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge.
Historically, the same claimant has sustained three back injuries, each while working for a different employer. Each was a compensable injury. The awards here in question, directed that the second and third employers and their carriers, bear equally the payment of any permanent compensation which may be awarded. The basic question for the decision of this Court is whether, under the facts, there can be a valid apportionment between the carriers.
PROCEDURES
Before a recitation of the facts we take this opportunity to express our ap proval of the procedures which were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. HadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Condos v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Culver v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976