Legal Opinion

State v. Mattox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1983No. 83 CA 08PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, P. J.

Defendant, Steve Mat-tox, was indicted on one count of aggravated trafficking in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(5) and (C)(5). Following defendant’s waiver of his right to a jury trial, a trial to the court was conducted resulting in his conviction. The defendant was subsequently sentenced to a term of from four to fifteen years incarceration in the Ohio State Reformatory. From that judgment defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and set forth a single assignment of error. Appellant maintains:

“The trial court erred in finding defendant guilty under O.R.C. Section 2925.03(A)(5) and (C)(5)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SamatarOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. MinottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. KozicOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In Re LemonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API