Legal Opinion

Homstead v. Town of Whately

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 31, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

A majority of the panel are of opinion that the Probate Court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the present action (one ostensibly brought under G. L. c. 231A) because the board of appeals, in its decision rendered under G. L. c. 40A, §§ 13 and 15(1), as in effect prior to St. 1975, c. 808, § 3, expressly determined that the way in question “is not a public way” and because the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy with respect to that determination was a timely appeal to the proper District Court or to the Superior Court under G. L. c. 40A, § 21, as also in effect prior to St. 1975, c.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Board of Appeals of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. Spaulding v. Board of Appeals of LeicesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Smith v. Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Potter v. Board of Appeals of MansfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  5. Hull v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API