United States Cellular Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
In an effort to speed implementation of enhanced 911 services for wireless phones, the Federal Communications Commission removed a provision conditioning wireless carriers’ obligation to purchase and install the necessary technology on guaranteed state or local government funding. The carriers challenge this decision, arguing that, among other things, it contravenes the cost causation principle adopted by this court in Competitive Telecommunications Association v. FCC, 87 F.3d 522, 529 (D.C.Cir.1996) (“Comptel”), is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Corson and Gruman Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Allied Local & Regional Manufacturers Caucus v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- National Telephone Cooperative Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Western States Petroleum etc. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.