Legal Opinion
Penaskovic v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 28, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 2095PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is the proper interpretation of Rule 47(e), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., in the matter of the number of peremptory challenges which may be exercised by each “side”.
The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit against F. W. Woolworth Co., a New York corporation, dba Woolco Department Store [Woolco], seeking recovery on two counts. The first count was based upon a products liability theory and the second count on a defective repair theory in relation to a bicycle. Gateway Corporation, a Missouri corporation, [Gateway] was the operator…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. NartenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Willey v. WhitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Moran v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Wasko v. FrankelArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.