Legal Opinion

Martin's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1894No. Appeal, No. 314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 314, Jan. T., 1893, by Luther Martin, Jr., et al., trustees, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1886, No. 508, ordering trustees to pay over to widow portion of principal of estate of Luther Martin, deceased. Petition for order on trustees to pay over portion of principal of estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 314, Jan. T., 1893, by Luther Martin, Jr., et al., trustees, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1886, No. 508, ordering trustees to pay over to widow portion of principal of estate of Luther Martin, deceased. Petition for order on trustees to pay over portion of principal of estate. The petition averred that Luther Martin, petitioner’s husband, died July 18, 1886, testate, leaving to survive him a widow, four daughters and two sons; that the will was duly admitted to probate in Philadelphia county and letters testamentary issued to the widow, two sons, Luther Martin, Jr.,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McCollum,

The learned orphans’ court, in making the order complained ■of, simply determined that under the will the petitioner was entitled to have from the principal of the estate the sum mention■ed in the petition for the purpose declared therein, without giving security therefor. It did not decide that the provisions •of the will in relation to her possession and care of the prop■erty constituted a gift to her “ of so much of the principal as she might see fit to appropriate.” It expressly declared that ■it was not necessary to do so. But the appellants contend that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jorge v. Da SilvaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  2. Poole v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API