Legal Opinion

Pomerantz v. County of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1982No. 80-5203PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge.

On August 16, 1977, appellants, three blind individuals and the National Federation of The Blind of California, filed suit in the District Court for the Central District of California, seeking declaratory relief, an injunction, damages, and attorney’s fees. The undisputed facts show that the Los Angeles County Jury Commissioner, and other employees directly involved in the jury selection process for the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles had, prior to January 1, 1978, excluded all blind persons from jury service solely because they were blind. Appellants…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State of California, on Behalf of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Neville Chemical Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Public Citizen v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Greater Los Angeles Council On Deafness, Inc. v. ZolinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API