Bryant v. Walt Sweeney Automotive, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
Defendant-appellant Walt Sweeney Automotive, Inc. ("Sweeney") appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury's verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Elizabeth and Richard Bryant ("the Bryants") on a claim of fraud in connection with the sale of a used motor vehicle. The Bryants, as cross-appellants, challenge the trial court's calculation of their award of attorney fees. We consider these two appeals together for purposes of this deci sion.
Prior to purchasing a new car, the Bryants saw a Sweeney advertisement in an auto magazine picturing a 1991 Lincoln Continental…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.