Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Walt Sweeney Automotive, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2002No. Appeal No. C-010395, C-010404, Trial No. A-9903067Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION.

Defendant-appellant Walt Sweeney Automotive, Inc. ("Sweeney") appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury's verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Elizabeth and Richard Bryant ("the Bryants") on a claim of fraud in connection with the sale of a used motor vehicle. The Bryants, as cross-appellants, challenge the trial court's calculation of their award of attorney fees. We consider these two appeals together for purposes of this deci sion.

Prior to purchasing a new car, the Bryants saw a Sweeney advertisement in an auto magazine picturing a 1991 Lincoln Continental…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API