Legal Opinion

Tackett v. First Sav. of Arkansas, FA

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1991No. 90-237PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellants, Charles Tackett and Alberta Tackett, appeal from the chancellor’s grant of foreclosure, filed by the appellee, First Savings of Arkansas, F.A. (First Savings). The Tacketts assert three arguments for reversal: 1) First Savings is not the record, legal owner of the indebtedness sued upon; 2) the contract sued upon by First Savings is usurious; and 3) the trial court had no authority to reopen the record to allow the admission of the certificate of First Federal Savings of Arkansas as to corporate existence. The final argument has merit but does not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. First National Bank of MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Killam v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Smith v. Figure World Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Lagios v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Anderson v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Hyatt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Jarell Davis Terry v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API