Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Post

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 12, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pelletreait, S.

The testatrix died February 22, 1918, leaving a will probated May 2, 1918. The third clause of the will reads as follows:

“ Third. I give, devise and bequeath to my Executor hereinafter named the piece of real property which I own in Cincinnati, Ohio, on which Miller & Yoorheis hold a ground lease, also Fourteen thousand Dollars ($14,000) par value of Haverstraw Water Supply First Mortgage Five Per Cent Bonds, also Fifty thousand Dollars ($50,000) par value of New York City Four Per Cent Bonds, in trust, to collect the rents, issues, profits and income of said real property and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Hadcox v. . CodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Burt v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Matter of HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of HirschhornNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  3. In re the Estate of HopkinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
  4. In re the Estate of OuterbridgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  5. In re the Estate of MorrillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API