Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Bowers

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 17, 1994No. 01-93-00805-CVPublished

1DissentAndell, Justice

By allowing the harmless error rule, which is promulgated for the efficient administration of justice, to take precedence over the fifth amendment under the facts in this case, the majority has today taken an unnecessary and unjustifiable step onto the slippery slope of government intrusion into our fives. U.S. Const. amend. V provides: “[N]or shall any person ... be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself....” After relator claimed this privilege, the trial court ordered him to the stand to be sworn and to testify. In so doing, the trial court contradicted a tenet of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API