Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1996No. COA95-652PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We disagree.

In State v. Handy, 326 N.C. 532, 391 S.E.2d 159 (1990), our Supreme Court held that a “presentence motion to withdraw a plea of guilty should be allowed for any fair and just reason.” Id. at 539, 391 S.E.2d at 162. The court in Handy identified several factors which, if present, would favor the granting of defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Some of the factors which favor withdrawal include whether the defendant has asserted his legal innocence, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. VillatoroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API