James J. Boyle & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
This action raises the question of what is the proper basis for determining the value for tariff purposes, of certain pneumatic hand-tools. Plaintiff (Nitto Kohki, U.S.A.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the tools’ manufacturer (Nitto Kohki, Japan), *223was the sole importer oí these items in 1972. Plaintiff contends that Customs erroneously computed the Export Value 1 of the goods in question; using the retail price minus a wholesaler’s discount, instead of list prices on invoices supplied by plaintiff’s parent company.
The essence of plaintiff’s argument in support of calculating…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Baldwin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Glenside Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Majestic Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980