Kesselring v. Hummer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Iowa District Court.— Hon. O. A. Byington, Judge. Action for damages occasioned by seduction. Judgment for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff alleged that defendant seduced her on the 12th day of April, 1903, and that, as a result, she was delivered of a child Jannary 14, 1904. The evidence shows, without controversy, that he had met her with increasing frequency since May, 1901, and that they were together in the evening of the day first mentioned, but he denied ever having-had intercourse with her. The-errors assigned relate to rulings on the admissibility of evidence and the instructions to the jury. These will be disposed of in the order argued.
*147i. seduction: other acts. *146I. The plaintiff was employed as a domestic…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yahn v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Insurance Company v. EastmanTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AsburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- State v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.