Siebert v. Bird
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJohnson, Judge
I respectfully dissent. Our case law is exigent in demanding clear and convincing evidence before an oral trust will be found. See, e.g., In Re Estate of Trbovich, 488 Pa. 583, 413 A.2d 379 (1980) (clear, precise, unambiguous, of the highest probative value). Sechler v. Sechler, 403 Pa. 1, 169 A.2d 78 (1961) (clear, precise and indubitable); Gribbel v. Gribbel, 341 Pa. 11, 17 A.2d 892 (1941) (clear, precise, indubitable, definite and convincing); Popilock v. Piernikoski, 161 Pa.Super. 587, 56 A.2d 326 (1948) (clear, precise and indubitable). I am not in agreement with the majority in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sechler v. SechlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- In Re Estate of TrbovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gribbel v. GribbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Popilock v. PiernikoskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947