Legal Opinion
Paine Webber, Inc. v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 95-3026Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, PaineWebber Inc., seeks from this Court an Order Compelling Arbitration, or in the alternative, for Consolidation or Injunctive Relief against Defendant, Gregory D. Johnson. For the reasons that follow, Injunctive Relief shall be granted.
*48Standard of Review
Section Four of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-14 (1970), gives courts the power to order a party to submit to arbitration “in the manner provided for” in a written arbitration agreement. A court should order arbitration upon a showing that “the making of the agreement for arbitration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,372 Executone Information Systems, Inc. v. Lloyd K. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Gavlik Construction Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.