Legal Opinion

Hough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1984No. 83-690PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

448 So.2d 628 (1984)

Tondrick HOUGH, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-690.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 19, 1984.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the statutory three-year minimum penalty provided for in section 775.087(2)(b) Florida Statutes (1981), may be imposed on a defendant found guilty of an armed robbery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Earnest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Reynolds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Tindall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Brewster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Freeny v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. State v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API