Legal Opinion

United States v. George Marcus Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1965No. 9712PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge.

In this direct appeal, we think the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the jury was given an unbalanced version of the “Allen” charge.

This Dyer Act case was submitted to the jury at some unspecified hour during the morning. At 12:15 o’clock in the afternoon, the foreman was recalled and asked if he thought the jury would soon reach a verdict. He responded that he thought not, whereupon the court instructed the Marshal to take the jury to lunch. Upon its return from lunch, the following proceedings were had:

The Court: I think I will charge this jury a little…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  2. Charles G. Rhodes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Peter RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. John Edward Jones, A/K/A Liddy Jones, A/K/A Malik Shariff, United States of America v. Robert Avon Jones, A/K/A BobbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Michael Warren Mason, United States of America v. William Casey Welsh, United States of America v. Mitchell ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Antonio Luis BurgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Calvin Wayne Dow, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API