Legal Opinion

Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R. v. Quaker City Flour Mills Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1924No. Appeal, 142PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Plaintiff is a common carrier engaged in the transportation of interstate commerce. Defendant, because of a violation of the company’s rules, duly promulgated, relating to¡ holding consigned cars, became liable to plaintiff for a sum of money, commonly called demur- rage, for which this suit was brought. The cause of action arose in 1916 and this proceeding was instituted in 1922. It was defendant’s position in the court below, and is here, that the right to sue was barred by the Transportation Act of February 28, 1920, ch. 91, section 424, 41 Stat. at L. 456,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Farmers National Bank & Trust Co. v. Berks County Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API