Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bylsma v. Burger King Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2013No. 86912-0Published

1DissentJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶12 (dissenting) — Deputy Sheriff Edward J. Bylsma was served a burger contaminated with spittle. Fortunately, Deputy Bylsma discovered the spittle before consuming the burger. For this, the responsible Burger King employee was charged and pleaded guilty to felony assault and was sentenced to 90 days in jail.

¶13 Now, Deputy Bylsma claims he was so traumatized by the spittle (which he did not consume) that he suffers from ongoing emotional distress, manifested by vomiting, nausea, food aversion, and sleeplessness. Deputy Bylsma sued Burger King and the restaurant operator, Kaizen Restaurants,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API