Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. Wagonfeld

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

This is a motion for temporary injunction restraining defendants from advertising, offering for sale, or selling at retail, merchandise bearing plaintiff’s trademark or brand name for prices less than those stipulated in plaintiff’s fair trade contracts. Jurisdiction of this court is based upon diversity of citizenship. The complaint states a claim under Section 369-a of the New York General Business Law. The verified complaint and the affidavits submitted in support of the motion show, at least for the purposes of this motion, that the following fact situation exists.

Pl…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Upjohn Company v. Liberty Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. General Electric Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Menley & James Laboratories v. Vornado, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Parke, Davis & Company v. Jarvis Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Schering Corp. v. Martin Wholesale Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Johnson v. Bellmore Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API