Legal Opinion
King v. Priest
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 10, 1947No. 39954PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DALTON, C.
[548] This is a class action by five patrolmen and four sergeants, members of the Metropolitan Police Force of the City of St. Louis, for and on behalf of thems'elves and all other patrolmen, sergeants and turnkeys of the Metropolitan Police Force of the City of St. Louis, similarly situated, for a declaratory judgment to the effect that Rule 23, See. 342 of the Police Manual adopted by the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis, prohibiting the members of the force from becoming members of a union of members, is unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McAuliffe v. Mayor and Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- City of Joplin v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.