Legal Opinion

McClammer v. Holmes (In re Holmes)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 4, 2017No. Case No. 16-41808; Adversary No. 16-4116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Arthur B. Federman, Bankruptcy Judge

Plaintiff Katie McClammer filed this adversary proceeding seeking a determination that an alleged debt owed to her by Debtor-Defendant Landon Reser Holmes is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) as a debt incurred by actual fraud. For the reasons that follow, judgment will be entered in favor of Ms. McClammer, but only as to the amount she advanced to Mr, Holmes on or before January 15, 2014.

Introduction

Plaintiff Katie McClammer asserts that Debtor Landon Holmes pursued a romantic relationship with her in order to defraud her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Merchants National Bank of Winona v. Moen (In Re Moen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re OphaugCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Sanford Institution for Savings v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kroesen v. WernesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
  2. Wernes v. KroesenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API