Legal Opinion

In re Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 20, 1984No. 22158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, the Respondent, Samuel B. Mitchell, III, is charged with misconduct tending to bring the Courts and the profession into disrepute. The Hearing Panel found that the Complaint had been proved and unanimously recommended that the Respondent be disbarred. Thereafter, the Executive Committee of the Board of Commissioners on Grievance and Discipline voted unanimously (4-0 with one member not participating) to accept the recommendation of the Hearing Panel and recommended to this Court that the Respondent be disbarred. A Rule to Show Cause was issued by this…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API