Legal Opinion

Housing Authority v. Key

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 2002No. 25545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We accepted this case in our original jurisdiction to determine whether respondent has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. We find he has and enjoin him from further engaging in such conduct.

FACTS

Petitioner (Housing Authority) commenced this action seeking to enjoin respondent Key from the unauthorized practice of law. We appointed the Honorable John W. Kittredge as special referee to hear evidence and make recommendations. Based on the uncontested facts set forth below, Judge Kittredge concluded respondent had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and recommended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linder v. Insurance Claims Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Doe v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Key v. Housing Authority of the City of Charleston, South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API