Legal Opinion

Suchman Corporate Park, Inc. v. Greenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 1992No. 91-2583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The summary judgment for the mortgagee-appellees is reversed because genuine issues are presented concerning the proper interpretation of the release agreement in question. Agricultural Alumni Seed Improvement Ass’n, Inc. v. Diaz, 432 So.2d 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). See Quayside Assocs., Ltd. v. Harbor Club Villas Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 419 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hoffman v. Terry, 397 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Mead v. Mead, 193 So.2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 552 (Fla.1967).

The order permitting distribution to the mortgagees of the sum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Hoffman v. TerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Quayside Assoc v. Harbour Club VillasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Heim v. KirklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First States Investors 3300, LLC v. PheilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Stewart v. Tasnet, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. CORALIA RUBIELLA v. CASCADE FUNDING RM3 ACQUISITIONS GRANTOR TRUSTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. ORQUIDEA CASTELLANOS v. REVERSE MORTGAGE FUNDING LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API