Legal Opinion
United States v. Various Slot MacHines on Guam, and Amanda Guzman Shelton, Claimant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1981No. 79-4390PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Appeal from a judgment forfeiting 9 machines alleged to be gambling machines as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1171(a)(1) and (2) and subject to forfeiture under 15 U.S.C. § 1177 for violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1172, by having been transported to Guam. The government moved for summary judgment and that motion was granted.
*698I. The Summary Judgment.
Section 1171(a)(1) defines “gambling device” to mean: “any so-called ‘slot machine’ or any other machine or mechanical device an essential part of which is a drum or reel with insignia thereon, and (A) which when operated may deliver, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Merit Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Roy Bieghler and Joanne Hoff v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior, United States of America, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by73 opinions
- Prieto-Romero v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- M & M Medical Supplies and Service, Incorporated v. Pleasant Valley Hospital, Incorporated Pleasant Valley Home Medical Equipment, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Evers v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.