Cohen v. Kosch
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Legal services rendered for a wife or child are necessaries as a matter of law (Dravecka v. Richard, 267 N. Y. 180). Becovery may not be had for services rendered to a child where the liability of the father has been fixed in a matrimonial decree (Karminski v. Karminski, 260 App. Div. 491). However, in this case the father retained the child contrary to the custody provisions of the matrimonial decree necessitating a habeas corpus proceeding against him. That proceeding was determined adversely to the father and the child returned to the mother, in accordance with the terms of the matrimonial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dravecka v. RichardNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Karminski v. KarminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friou v. GentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Fanelli v. BarclayNassau County District Court · 1979
- Errico v. Manville, New York County Courts1969
- Gallin v. StaffordCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959
- Merrick v. MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1995