Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Kosch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 17, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Legal services rendered for a wife or child are necessaries as a matter of law (Dravecka v. Richard, 267 N. Y. 180). Becovery may not be had for services rendered to a child where the liability of the father has been fixed in a matrimonial decree (Karminski v. Karminski, 260 App. Div. 491). However, in this case the father retained the child contrary to the custody provisions of the matrimonial decree necessitating a habeas corpus proceeding against him. That proceeding was determined adversely to the father and the child returned to the mother, in accordance with the terms of the matrimonial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dravecka v. RichardNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Karminski v. KarminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friou v. GentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Fanelli v. BarclayNassau County District Court · 1979
  3. Errico v. Manville, New York County Courts1969
  4. Gallin v. StaffordCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959
  5. Merrick v. MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API