Legal Opinion

Monsanto-Swan v. Government of the Virgin Islands

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided January 25, 1996No. D.C.Crim. No. 92-211PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jacquelyn Monsanto-Swan ["appellant" or "Monsanto-Swan"] pled guilty to one count of an information charging her with misappropriating public funds to her own use, in exchange for dismissal of the other eight counts; later she agreed to make restitution of the full amount described as misappropriated in the information. Appellant here contends that her agreement to pay the full restitution of over $96,000 entitled her to a probationary sentence without having to serve a period of incarceration. When this matter was before us the first time, we held that the Appellate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Nibbs v. RobertsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1995
  5. Waialua Agricultural Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prosser v. ProsserDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  2. Karpouzis v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
  3. Charleswell v. Government of Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. MartinezDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
  5. Camacho v. DodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API