Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 9, 1934No. 437Published
1Opinion of the Court
72 F.2d 256 (1934)
SCHWARTZ
v.
UNITED MERCHANTS & MANUFACTURERS, Inc.
No. 437.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 9, 1934.
Sutta & Frankel, of New York City (Emil Weitzner, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Thornton Alexander, of Boston, Mass. (James H. Halpin and Kenneth M. Spence, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The action was for breach by the defendant, a corporation, of a contract between itself and the plaintiff. The defendant held a majority of the shares of two other…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Oakes v. Cattaraugus Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.