Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Robert S. Gordon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2004No. 03-10322Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFernandez, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion, with the exception of parts II, B-l and II, B-4, as to which I dissent.

Congress did, no doubt, want to help make victims of crimes whole when it enacted 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. However, Congress also hoped to avoid creating a system that would, essentially, turn criminal sentencing hearings into complicated, prolonged trials of the normal civil variety. See 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(3)(B). Therefore, Congress did not provide that a victim could simply recover the damages that would, or might, be available in a typical civil case. Rather, when it came to defining the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API