Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Burke v. Bromberger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949Published

1Dissent

Lewis and Conway, JJ.,

dissent in the following memorandum : While we may not substitute our judgment for that of the removing officer, we can and must determine whether the person alleging incompetency or misconduct has sustained the burden of proof, under subdivision 1 of section 22 of the Civil Service Law, by “ substantial evidence ”. (Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65, 69.) In the instant case, in view of the confused, conflicting and self-contradictory testimony of the sole witness for appellant, the lack of corroboration of essential particulars of her story, and the undisputed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Miller v. KlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Matter of O'Kelly v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API