Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Klahm

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1967No. Docket 2,535PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint in this case alleged that defendants conspired to defraud and cheat plaintiff’s decedent by preying upon her elderly and senile condition and by exerting illegal, and undue influence. The case went to trial and judgment on a jury verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff.

One of defendants’ many assignments of error on appeal is that plaintiff’s allegation of undue influence was insufficient to raise an issue regarding the existence of a “confidential or fiduciary relation” between the decedent and the defendants. Finding such a relation and a resulting .benefit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re Wood EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. LaForest v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. WhitsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Taylor v. KlahmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. WinhovenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. In Re Kanable EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Georgeff v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API