Legal Opinion

In re Thompson

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1910No. 4,840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In the matter of the bankruptcy of F. T. Thompson. On petition for a rule to show cause why the alleged bankrupt should not be attached for contempt for failing to answer interrogatories by petitioning creditors.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

To the original petition the bankrupt filed an answer, denying insolvency, and demanding a trial by jury. No further steps were taken in the case until the petitioning creditors applied for a rule upon the bankrupt to show cause why he should not be attached for contempt for failing to answer certain interrogatories filed by them. The matter before the court is whether or not the court should grant the rule to show cause.

By the interrogatories the creditors seek disclosure by the bankrupt of matters relating to a transfer or transfers of real property and disclosure of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re FleischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
  2. Skubinsky v. BodekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ShulundDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API