Legal Opinion

Haddox v. Central Freightlines, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 2025No. 4:18-cv-00266Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DANNY HADDOX, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 18-CV-266-SEH-CDL CENTRAL FREIGHTLINES, INC.; NICHOLAS ROSHON MOORE, Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION Before the Court is Defendant Central Freightlines, Inc.’s (“CFL”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 60]. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted as to Plaintiffs’ claims asserted against CFL for negligent maintenance and service, negligence per se, negligent hiring, retention, supervision and training, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Kannady v. City of KiowaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API